These are great evils; and it must be added that they appear to me to be irremediable. I believe that the Indian nations of North America are doomed to perish; and that whenever the Europeans shall be established on the shores of the Pacific Ocean, that race of men will be no more. *i The Indians had only the two alternatives of war or civilization; in other words, they must either have destroyed the Europeans or become their equals.
i
[ This seems, indeed, to be the opinion of almost all American statesmen.
“Judging of the future by the past,” says Mr. Cass, “we
cannot err in anticipating a progressive diminution of their numbers, and their
eventual extinction, unless our border should become stationary, and they be
removed beyond it, or unless some radical change should take place in the
principles of our intercourse with them, which it is easier to hope for than to
expect.”]
At the first settlement of the colonies they might have found it possible, by uniting their forces, to deliver themselves from the small bodies of strangers who landed on their continent. *j They several times attempted to do it, and were on the point of succeeding; but the disproportion of their resources, at the present day, when compared with those of the whites, is too great to allow such an enterprise to be thought of. Nevertheless, there do arise from time to time among the Indians men of penetration, who foresee the final destiny which awaits the native population, and who exert themselves to unite all the tribes in common hostility to the Europeans; but their efforts are unavailing. Those tribes which are in the neighborhood of the whites, are too much weakened to offer an effectual resistance; whilst the others, giving way to that childish carelessness of the morrow which characterizes savage life, wait for the near approach of danger before they prepare to meet it; some are unable, the others are unwilling, to exert themselves.
j
[ Amongst other warlike enterprises, there was one of the Wampanaogs, and other
confederate tribes, under Metacom in 1675, against the colonists of New
England; the English were also engaged in war in Virginia in 1622.]
It is easy to foresee that the Indians will never conform to civilization; or that it will be too late, whenever they may be inclined to make the experiment.
Civilization is the result of a long social process which takes place in the same spot, and is handed down from one generation to another, each one profiting by the experience of the last. Of all nations, those submit to civilization with the most difficulty which habitually live by the chase. Pastoral tribes, indeed, often change their place of abode; but they follow a regular order in their migrations, and often return again to their old stations, whilst the dwelling of the hunter varies with that of the animals he pursues.
Several attempts have been made to diffuse knowledge amongst the Indians, without controlling their wandering propensities; by the Jesuits in Canada, and by the Puritans in New England; *k but none of these endeavors were crowned by any lasting success. Civilization began in the cabin, but it soon retired to expire in the woods. The great error of these legislators of the Indians was their not understanding that, in order to succeed in civilizing a people, it is first necessary to fix it; which cannot be done without inducing it to cultivate the soil; the Indians ought in the first place to have been accustomed to agriculture. But not only are they destitute of this indispensable preliminary to civilization, they would even have great difficulty in acquiring it. Men who have once abandoned themselves to the restless and adventurous life of the hunter, feel an insurmountable disgust for the constant and regular labor which tillage requires. We see this proved in the bosom of our own society; but it is far more visible among peoples whose partiality for the chase is a part of their national character.
k
[ See the “Histoire de la Nouvelle France,” by Charlevoix, and the
work entitled “Lettres edifiantes.”]
Independently of this general difficulty, there is another, which applies peculiarly to the Indians; they consider labor not merely as an evil, but as a disgrace; so that their pride prevents them from becoming civilized, as much as their indolence. *l
l
[ “In all the tribes,” says Volney, in his “Tableau des
Etats-Unis,” p. 423, “there still exists a generation of old
warriors, who cannot forbear, when they see their countrymen using the hoe,
from exclaiming against the degradation of ancient manners, and asserting that
the savages owe their decline to these innovations; adding, that they have only
to return to their primitive habits in order to recover their power and their
glory.”]
There is no Indian so wretched as not to retain under his hut of bark a lofty idea of his personal worth; he considers the cares of industry and labor as degrading occupations; he compares the husbandman to the ox which traces the furrow; and even in our most ingenious handicraft, he can see nothing but the labor of slaves. Not that he is devoid of admiration for the power and intellectual greatness of the whites; but although the result of our efforts surprises him, he contemns the means by which we obtain it; and while he acknowledges our ascendancy, he still believes in his superiority. War and hunting are the only pursuits which appear to him worthy to be the occupations of a man. *m The Indian, in the dreary solitude of his woods, cherishes the same ideas, the same opinions as the noble of the Middle Ages in his castle, and he only requires to become a conqueror to complete the resemblance; thus, however strange it may seem, it is in the forests of the New World, and not amongst the Europeans who people its coasts, that the ancient prejudices of Europe are still in existence.
m
[ The following description occurs in an official document: “Until a
young man has been engaged with an enemy, and has performed some acts of valor,
he gains no consideration, but is regarded nearly as a woman. In their great
war-dances all the warriors in succession strike the post, as it is called, and
recount their exploits. On these occasions their auditory consists of the
kinsmen, friends, and comrades of the narrator. The profound impression which
his discourse produces on them is manifested by the silent attention it
receives, and by the loud shouts which hail its termination. The young man who
finds himself at such a meeting without anything to recount is very unhappy;
and instances have sometimes occurred of young warriors, whose passions had
been thus inflamed, quitting the war-dance suddenly, and going off alone to
seek for trophies which they might exhibit, and adventures which they might be
allowed to relate.”]
More than once, in the course of this work, I have endeavored to explain the prodigious influence which the social condition appears to exercise upon the laws and the manners of men; and I beg to add a few words on the same subject.
When I perceive the resemblance which exists between the political institutions of our ancestors, the Germans, and of the wandering tribes of North America; between the customs described by Tacitus, and those of which I have sometimes been a witness, I cannot help thinking that the same cause has brought about the same results in both hemispheres; and that in the midst of the apparent diversity of human affairs, a certain number of primary facts may be discovered, from which all the others are derived. In what we usually call the German institutions, then, I am inclined only to perceive barbarian habits; and the opinions of savages in what we style feudal principles.
However strongly the vices and prejudices of the North American Indians may be opposed to their becoming agricultural and civilized, necessity sometimes obliges them to it. Several of the Southern nations, and amongst others the Cherokees and the Creeks, *n were surrounded by Europeans, who had landed on the shores of the Atlantic; and who, either descending the Ohio or proceeding up the Mississippi, arrived simultaneously upon their borders. These tribes have not been driven from place to place, like their Northern brethren; but they have been gradually enclosed within narrow limits, like the game within the thicket, before the huntsmen plunge into the interior. The Indians who were thus placed between civilization and death, found themselves obliged to live by ignominious labor like the whites. They took to agriculture, and without entirely forsaking their old habits or manners, sacrificed only as much as was necessary to their existence.
n
[ These nations are now swallowed up in the States of Georgia, Tennessee,
Alabama, and Mississippi. There were formerly in the South four great nations
(remnants of which still exist), the Choctaws, the Chickasaws, the Creeks, and
the Cherokees. The remnants of these four nations amounted, in 1830, to about
75,000 individuals. It is computed that there are now remaining in the
territory occupied or claimed by the Anglo-American Union about 300,000
Indians. (See Proceedings of the Indian Board in the City of New York.) The
official documents supplied to Congress make the number amount to 313,130. The
reader who is curious to know the names and numerical strength of all the
tribes which inhabit the Anglo-American territory should consult the documents
I refer to. (Legislative Documents, 20th Congress, No. 117, pp. 90-105.) [In
the Census of 1870 it is stated that the Indian population of the United States
is only 25,731, of whom 7,241 are in California.]]
The Cherokees went further; they created a written language; established a permanent form of government; and as everything proceeds rapidly in the New World, before they had all of them clothes, they set up a newspaper. *o
o
[ I brought back with me to France one or two copies of this singular
publication.]
The growth of European habits has been remarkably accelerated among these Indians by the mixed race which has sprung up. *p Deriving intelligence from their father’s side, without entirely losing the savage customs of the mother, the half-blood forms the natural link between civilization and barbarism. Wherever this race has multiplied the savage state has become modified, and a great change has taken place in the manners of the people. *q
p
[ See in the Report of the Committee on Indian Affairs, 21st Congress, No. 227,
p. 23, the reasons for the multiplication of Indians of mixed blood among the
Cherokees. The principal cause dates from the War of Independence. Many
Anglo-Americans of Georgia, having taken the side of England, were obliged to
retreat among the Indians, where they married.]
q
[ Unhappily the mixed race has been less numerous and less influential in North
America than in any other country. The American continent was peopled by two
great nations of Europe, the French and the English. The former were not slow
in connecting themselves with the daughters of the natives, but there was an
unfortunate affinity between the Indian character and their own: instead of
giving the tastes and habits of civilized life to the savages, the French too
often grew passionately fond of the state of wild freedom they found them in.
They became the most dangerous of the inhabitants of the desert, and won the
friendship of the Indian by exaggerating his vices and his virtues. M. de
Senonville, the governor of Canada, wrote thus to Louis XIV in 1685: “It
has long been believed that in order to civilize the savages we ought to draw
them nearer to us. But there is every reason to suppose we have been mistaken.
Those which have been brought into contact with us have not become French, and
the French who have lived among them are changed into savages, affecting to
dress and live like them.” (“History of New France,” by
Charlevoix, vol. ii., p. 345.) The Englishman, on the contrary, continuing
obstinately attached to the customs and the most insignificant habits of his
forefathers, has remained in the midst of the American solitudes just what he
was in the bosom of European cities; he would not allow of any communication
with savages whom he despised, and avoided with care the union of his race with
theirs. Thus while the French exercised no salutary influence over the Indians,
the English have always remained alien from them.]
The success of the Cherokees proves that the Indians are capable of civilization, but it does not prove that they will succeed in it. This difficulty which the Indians find in submitting to civilization proceeds from the influence of a general cause, which it is almost impossible for them to escape. An attentive survey of history demonstrates that, in general, barbarous nations have raised themselves to civilization by degrees, and by their own efforts. Whenever they derive knowledge from a foreign people, they stood towards it in the relation of conquerors, and not of a conquered nation. When the conquered nation is enlightened, and the conquerors are half savage, as in the case of the invasion of Rome by the Northern nations or that of China by the Mongols, the power which victory bestows upon the barbarian is sufficient to keep up his importance among civilized men, and permit him to rank as their equal, until he becomes their rival: the one has might on his side, the other has intelligence; the former admires the knowledge and the arts of the conquered, the latter envies the power of the conquerors. The barbarians at length admit civilized man into their palaces, and he in turn opens his schools to the barbarians. But when the side on which the physical force lies, also possesses an intellectual preponderance, the conquered party seldom become civilized; it retreats, or is destroyed. It may therefore be said, in a general way, that savages go forth in arms to seek knowledge, but that they do not receive it when it comes to them.
If the Indian tribes which now inhabit the heart of the continent could summon up energy enough to attempt to civilize themselves, they might possibly succeed. Superior already to the barbarous nations which surround them, they would gradually gain strength and experience, and when the Europeans should appear upon their borders, they would be in a state, if not to maintain their independence, at least to assert their right to the soil, and to incorporate themselves with the conquerors. But it is the misfortune of Indians to be brought into contact with a civilized people, which is also (it must be owned) the most avaricious nation on the globe, whilst they are still semi-barbarian: to find despots in their instructors, and to receive knowledge from the hand of oppression. Living in the freedom of the woods, the North American Indian was destitute, but he had no feeling of inferiority towards anyone; as soon, however, as he desires to penetrate into the social scale of the whites, he takes the lowest rank in society, for he enters, ignorant and poor, within the pale of science and wealth. After having led a life of agitation, beset with evils and dangers, but at the same time filled with proud emotions, *r he is obliged to submit to a wearisome, obscure, and degraded state; and to gain the bread which nourishes him by hard and ignoble labor; such are in his eyes the only results of which civilization can boast: and even this much he is not sure to obtain.
r
[ There is in the adventurous life of the hunter a certain irresistible charm,
which seizes the heart of man and carries him away in spite of reason and
experience. This is plainly shown by the memoirs of Tanner. Tanner is a
European who was carried away at the age of six by the Indians, and has
remained thirty years with them in the woods. Nothing can be conceived more
appalling that the miseries which he describes. He tells us of tribes without a
chief, families without a nation to call their own, men in a state of
isolation, wrecks of powerful tribes wandering at random amid the ice and snow
and desolate solitudes of Canada. Hunger and cold pursue them; every day their
life is in jeopardy. Amongst these men, manners have lost their empire,
traditions are without power. They become more and more savage. Tanner shared
in all these miseries; he was aware of his European origin; he was not kept
away from the whites by force; on the contrary, he came every year to trade
with them, entered their dwellings, and witnessed their enjoyments; he knew
that whenever he chose to return to civilized life he was perfectly able to do
so—and he remained thirty years in the deserts. When he came into
civilized society he declared that the rude existence which he described, had a
secret charm for him which he was unable to define: he returned to it again and
again: at length he abandoned it with poignant regret; and when he was at
length fixed among the whites, several of his children refused to share his
tranquil and easy situation. I saw Tanner myself at the lower end of Lake
Superior; he seemed to me to be more like a savage than a civilized being. His
book is written without either taste or order; but he gives, even
unconsciously, a lively picture of the prejudices, the passions, the vices,
and, above all, of the destitution in which he lived.]
When the Indians undertake to imitate their European neighbors, and to till the earth like the settlers, they are immediately exposed to a very formidable competition. The white man is skilled in the craft of agriculture; the Indian is a rough beginner in an art with which he is unacquainted. The former reaps abundant crops without difficulty, the latter meets with a thousand obstacles in raising the fruits of the earth.
The European is placed amongst a population whose wants he knows and partakes. The savage is isolated in the midst of a hostile people, with whose manners, language, and laws he is imperfectly acquainted, but without whose assistance he cannot live. He can only procure the materials of comfort by bartering his commodities against the goods of the European, for the assistance of his countrymen is wholly insufficient to supply his wants. When the Indian wishes to sell the produce of his labor, he cannot always meet with a purchaser, whilst the European readily finds a market; and the former can only produce at a considerable cost that which the latter vends at a very low rate. Thus the Indian has no sooner escaped those evils to which barbarous nations are exposed, than he is subjected to the still greater miseries of civilized communities; and he finds is scarcely less difficult to live in the midst of our abundance, than in the depth of his own wilderness.
He has not yet lost the habits of his erratic life; the traditions of his fathers and his passion for the chase are still alive within him. The wild enjoyments which formerly animated him in the woods, painfully excite his troubled imagination; and his former privations appear to be less keen, his former perils less appalling. He contrasts the independence which he possessed amongst his equals with the servile position which he occupies in civilized society. On the other hand, the solitudes which were so long his free home are still at hand; a few hours’ march will bring him back to them once more. The whites offer him a sum, which seems to him to be considerable, for the ground which he has begun to clear. This money of the Europeans may possibly furnish him with the means of a happy and peaceful subsistence in remoter regions; and he quits the plough, resumes his native arms, and returns to the wilderness forever. *s The condition of the Creeks and Cherokees, to which I have already alluded, sufficiently corroborates the truth of this deplorable picture.
s
[ The destructive influence of highly civilized nations upon others which are
less so, has been exemplified by the Europeans themselves. About a century ago
the French founded the town of Vincennes up on the Wabash, in the middle of the
desert; and they lived there in great plenty until the arrival of the American
settlers, who first ruined the previous inhabitants by their competition, and
afterwards purchased their lands at a very low rate. At the time when M. de
Volney, from whom I borrow these details, passed through Vincennes, the number
of the French was reduced to a hundred individuals, most of whom were about to
pass over to Louisiana or to Canada. These French settlers were worthy people,
but idle and uninstructed: they had contracted many of the habits of savages.
The Americans, who were perhaps their inferiors, in a moral point of view, were
immeasurably superior to them in intelligence: they were industrious, well
informed, rich, and accustomed to govern their own community.
I myself saw in Canada, where the intellectual difference between the two races is less striking, that the English are the masters of commerce and manufacture in the Canadian country, that they spread on all sides, and confine the French within limits which scarcely suffice to contain them. In like manner, in Louisiana, almost all activity in commerce and manufacture centres in the hands of the Anglo-Americans.
But the case of Texas is still more striking: the State of Texas is a part of Mexico, and lies upon the frontier between that country and the United States. In the course of the last few years the Anglo-Americans have penetrated into this province, which is still thinly peopled; they purchase land, they produce the commodities of the country, and supplant the original population. It may easily be foreseen that if Mexico takes no steps to check this change, the province of Texas will very shortly cease to belong to that government.
If the different degrees—comparatively so slight—which exist in European civilization produce results of such magnitude, the consequences which must ensue from the collision of the most perfect European civilization with Indian savages may readily be conceived.]
The Indians, in the little which they have done, have unquestionably displayed as much natural genius as the peoples of Europe in their most important designs; but nations as well as men require time to learn, whatever may be their intelligence and their zeal. Whilst the savages were engaged in the work of civilization, the Europeans continued to surround them on every side, and to confine them within narrower limits; the two races gradually met, and they are now in immediate juxtaposition to each other. The Indian is already superior to his barbarous parent, but he is still very far below his white neighbor. With their resources and acquired knowledge, the Europeans soon appropriated to themselves most of the advantages which the natives might have derived from the possession of the soil; they have settled in the country, they have purchased land at a very low rate or have occupied it by force, and the Indians have been ruined by a competition which they had not the means of resisting. They were isolated in their own country, and their race only constituted a colony of troublesome aliens in the midst of a numerous and domineering people. *t
t
[ See in the Legislative Documents (21st Congress, No. 89) instances of
excesses of every kind committed by the whites upon the territory of the
Indians, either in taking possession of a part of their lands, until compelled
to retire by the troops of Congress, or carrying off their cattle, burning
their houses, cutting down their corn, and doing violence to their persons. It
appears, nevertheless, from all these documents that the claims of the natives
are constantly protected by the government from the abuse of force. The Union
has a representative agent continually employed to reside among the Indians;
and the report of the Cherokee agent, which is among the documents I have
referred to, is almost always favorable to the Indians. “The intrusion of
whites,” he says, “upon the lands of the Cherokees would cause ruin
to the poor, helpless, and inoffensive inhabitants.” And he further
remarks upon the attempt of the State of Georgia to establish a division line
for the purpose of limiting the boundaries of the Cherokees, that the line
drawn having been made by the whites, and entirely upon ex parte evidence of
their several rights, was of no validity whatever.]
Washington said in one of his messages to Congress, “We are more enlightened and more powerful than the Indian nations, we are therefore bound in honor to treat them with kindness and even with generosity.” But this virtuous and high-minded policy has not been followed. The rapacity of the settlers is usually backed by the tyranny of the government. Although the Cherokees and the Creeks are established upon the territory which they inhabited before the settlement of the Europeans, and although the Americans have frequently treated with them as with foreign nations, the surrounding States have not consented to acknowledge them as independent peoples, and attempts have been made to subject these children of the woods to Anglo-American magistrates, laws, and customs. *u Destitution had driven these unfortunate Indians to civilization, and oppression now drives them back to their former condition: many of them abandon the soil which they had begun to clear, and return to their savage course of life.
u
[ In 1829 the State of Alabama divided the Creek territory into counties, and
subjected the Indian population to the power of European magistrates.
In 1830 the State of Mississippi assimilated the Choctaws and Chickasaws to the white population, and declared that any of them that should take the title of chief would be punished by a fine of $1,000 and a year’s imprisonment. When these laws were enforced upon the Choctaws, who inhabited that district, the tribe assembled, their chief communicated to them the intentions of the whites, and read to them some of the laws to which it was intended that they should submit; and they unanimously declared that it was better at once to retreat again into the wilds.]
All books are sourced from Project Gutenberg